@Article{AbreuCDJVRAFBG:2022:IoGPRe,
author = "Abreu, Alessandro Jos{\'e} de and Correia, Em{\'{\i}}lia and
Denardini, Clezio Marcos and Jesus, Rodolfo de and Venkatesh, K.
and Roberto, M. and Abalde, J. R. and Fagundes, P. R. and Bolzan,
M. J. A. and Gende, M.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura
and {Instituto Tecnol{\'o}gico de Aeron{\'a}utica (ITA)} and
{Instituto Tecnol{\'o}gico de Aeron{\'a}utica (ITA)} and
{Universidade do Vale do Para{\'{\i}}ba (UNIVAP)} and
{Universidade Federal de Jata{\'{\i}} (UFJ)} and {Universidad
Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)}",
title = "Ionospheric GPS-TEC responses from equatorial region to the EIA
crest in the South American sector under intense space weather
conditions",
journal = "Journal of Atmospheric and Solar Terrestrial Physics",
year = "2022",
volume = "227",
pages = "e105801",
month = "Jan.",
keywords = "EIA, Geomagnetic storm, GPS, Ionosphere.",
abstract = "We present and discuss the ionospheric F-region observations from
equator to the equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) regions over
the South American sector during an intense space weather event
occurred between 27 and May 29, 2017. During this geomagnetic
storm, the symmetric-H (SYM-H) reached a minimum of \−142
nT at \∼0700 UT on May 28, 2017. For this investigation, we
analyze the vertical total electron content (VTEC) observations
from a chain of nearly 120 Global Positioning System (GPS)
stations. Magnetometer measurements obtained at two stations in
the low latitude regions are also presented. The observations do
not indicate prompt penetration electric field (PPEF) effects in
the VTEC variations. Magnetometer's observations over Cuiab{\'a}
(CBA) and Cachoeira Paulista (CXP) in central west and south parts
of Brazil, respectively, have shown a strong cross-correlation
with SYM-H in the period between 3 and 48 h. The results also show
positive ionospheric storm phase during the recovery phase on May
28, 2017. Positive effect during the recovery phase of the
geomagnetic storm is possibly associated with effects of
disturbances winds. During the recovery phase, a strong
intensification of the EIA took place, possibly related to an
additional ionization effect. The VTEC values show differences
between the west and east sectors. This indicates that the EIA
crest is stronger in the east sector than in the west sector,
possibly due to the combination of disturbance wind effects and
geomagnetic field geometry where in the east sector the field
lines are more inclined.",
doi = "10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105801",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2021.105801",
issn = "1364-6826",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Abreu_Ionospheric_2022.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "28 abr. 2024"
}